Did you know…
…that the Save Darfur Coalition is NOT a Better Business Bureau accredited charity?
According to the BBB report issued February 2009:
Save Darfur Coalition (SDC) does not meet the following 3 Standards for Charity Accountability.
Standard 3: Frequency and Attendance of Board Meetings – An organization shall have a minimum of three evenly spaced meetings per year of the full governing body with a majority in attendance, with face-to-face participation. A conference call of the full board can substitute for one of the three meetings of the governing body. For all meetings, alternative modes of participation are acceptable for those with physical disabilities.
* SDC does not meet the meeting frequency provision of this Standard for meetings held in the past fiscal year because although six meetings were held, only one was in person.
Standard 12: Detailed Functional Breakdown of Expenses – Include in the financial statements a breakdown of expenses (e.g., salaries, travel, postage, etc.) that shows what portion of these expenses was allocated to program, fund raising, and administrative activities. If the charity has more than one major program category, the schedule should provide a breakdown for each category.
* SDC does not meet this Standard because its financial statements did not include a detailed functional breakdown of expenses by natural classification (e.g., salaries, travel, postage, etc.) that shows what portion of these expenses was allocated to program, fund raising, and administrative activities.
Standard 16: Annual Report – Have an annual report available to all, on request, that includes: (a) the organization’s mission statement, (b) a summary of the past year’s program service accomplishments, (c) a roster of the officers and members of the board of directors, (d) financial information that includes (i) total income in the past fiscal year, (ii) expenses in the same program, fund raising and administrative categories as in the financial statements, and (iii) ending net assets.
* SDC does not meet this Standard because it states it does not have an annual report covering activities conducted in the past year.
For an organization that has raised/spent tens of millions of dollars from well-meaning donors to NOT meet these most basic of organizational operating standards is inexplicable, not to mention irresponsible.